Although I have
mentioned before that America has not conducted a comprehensive study on food
waste since 1997, the EPA does publish a report on “Municipal Solid Waste in
the United States “every year, the most recent from 2012. Municipal Solid Waste
(MSW) is simply garbage, excluding industrial, hazardous, or construction
waste. I hope that by now you are not surprised when I tell you that food waste
is the largest component of discards at 21.1 %. Understandably, 21.1% is not a
particularly outrageous number, so hopefully these additional percentages will clarify
the situation. In composting and recycling, only
4.8% of food waste generated is recovered, whereas 64.6% of paper is recycled. The
amount of paper recovered is equivalent to subtracting 27 million cars from the
roads in a year. While America’s recycling has skyrocketed over the years, why has
the number of community composting programs decreased
from 2002 to 2012 when food waste has increased?
If we are such diligent recyclers, then we can certainly become avid composters!
However, most people are probably reluctant to place a stinky compost container
in their backyard, which is why local governments need to get involved. Just
imagine: resting on the curb next to your trash can and blue recycling bin, is a
lovely green bin filled with food waste to be emptied into a truck and taken to
the nearest composting site.
I also read Nancy MacDonald’s
article “What a Waste,” and let me just say, it is the most strongly-worded
piece I’ve read so far. MacDonald is pushing the fine line between passionate
and angry-accusatory-offensive. For instance, she condemns the destruction of
crops to increase market prices as a “legal, if disgusting, measure” and
criticizes the fact that “Laws, perversely, seem to bolster food waste.” However,
MacDonald argument does remind me of some important points such as the relationship
between cheap prices, caloric intake, and food waste. Before 1952, “Americans
spent more than 20 percent of their incomes on food. Last year that portion hit
an all-time low of 5.6 percent—even as the number of calories available per
person per day rose by 9 percent (In Pakistan, by comparison, the percent of
spending on food can reach 75 percent of income).” Like many other sources,
MacDonald mentions the significance of “ugly” food which is discarded by
growers for being “outsized, double-lobed, too small, too big, too wonky, with
eyes, not perfectly smooth, [or] not perfectly rounded.” Hey! I’m most of those
things and I’m fine (and the produce is too!). Nowadays, people are always
talking about embracing your imperfections, but how can we apply that idea to
people if we don’t even eat externally imperfect produce?
![]() |
| Ugly Lemon wants to be eaten too! (Photo by Uli Westphal) |
My last source, Waste and Want: A Social History of Trash, is quite different froom everything else I’ve read because Susan Strasser
focuses on how the culture of throwing away things has dramatically shifted in
America. She analyzes old household manuals and cookbooks to formulate an idea
of a certain time period. I was utterly fascinated as Strasser explained the
ways Americans used food waste as far back as the 1800s. On the farm, food
scraps were saved in a pail to feed the animals. As for the smell? Strasser
says that back then people weren’t fussy; “even the most refined could scarely
have been squeamish about malodorous garbage.” Furthermore, urban food waste
was also eaten by animals. How? Get this: scavenger pigs, goats, dogs and cows roamed the city streets, eating any
accessible trash. Sadly, these scavenger snimals were banned by most cities
after the civil war, despite their extraordinary effectiveness in cleaning up
garbage. Additionally, Strasser describes how most households saved their
cooking grease to reuse or make into candles and soap. However, after
industrialization, many families turned to commercial products rather than make
their own. She laments how the change from “home to factory, from production to
consumption, from handicraft to purchasing” has caused “Kitchen scraps, reused
in the more productive household of the nineteenth century, [to be] discarded
with the packaging or ground up and washed down the drain.” Strasser’s research
has enlightned me on our frugal ways of the past. While I don’t advocate
letting feral pigs loose in New York City, I do believe we can learn a great
deal from our traditional roots. For example, we can fully encourage giving
food scraps to pig farms and not ban the practice like Great Britain did in
2001. We should cook creative traditional recipes, such as bread pudding and potato
skin soup. Perhaps we can all adopt the Depression Era motto “Use it up, wear
it out, make it do or do without!”


Tiffany-
ReplyDeleteThe facts in your first paragraph really helped me picture the amount of trash that we do not compost. I completely agree that we should all compost and recycle because we might not only does it improve our ecosystem but also ensures that nothing is wasted (that everything has a purpose). However, like many I have a hard time recycling regularly. However, how do you propose we start make recycling and composting a regular habit? Also what will be the costs and along with the benefits of composting and recycling everyday? In your second paragraph you talk about how society throws away "imperfect" produce, but can you really blame them? We have been taught to look for food that look funky because such are indications of spoilage or rotting. In my opinion our health and well-being stands more important than saving a weirdly looking tomato. Lastly, I totally agreed with your last point of giving the unused food scrapings to the animals because not only will they enjoy their meals but also prevent our community from wasting food. I greatly enjoyed reading your research and look forward to learning more in your future posts!